| 1 | From Germans to Romans | Brenda Ludvigsen |
| 2 | Roman Votive Coins from Piercebridge Identified | Ray Selkirk |
| 3 | Silk | Peter Dewart |
| 4 | The Truth Behind Raymond Selkirk's Stay in Hospital | Pauline Magee |
| 5 | Hadrian - Wall Builder | Tom Wright |
| 6 | NAG Documentary Premiered | |
| 7 | Major Town Rediscovered | |
| 8 | More Water Power | |
| 9 | Book Review - Chester-le-Street and it Place in History | |
| 10 | Did You Know? - Rain | Norman Cassidy |
By
Brenda R Ludvigsen
The Group received an unusual request during the summer, to inspect an underground air raid shelter, left over from World War II. Mr Harrison from Roman Avenue, Chester-le-Street had moved his garden shed in his back garden to build a patio for his wife and had discovered the construction. He thought the building should be recorded and contacted Raymond Selkirk. However, Ray was in hospital at the time and I was asked to investigate.
Mr Harrison’s house is semi-detached, the eastside one of the pair, and the two houses were built in the late 1950s in the orchard of the neighbouring house. The other properties in the area are from the 1930s, erected on farmland, so the shelter was probably for the use of Mr Harrison’s neighbour. The concrete roof of the shelter was level with his lawn, half of it in his garden and the other half under the garden of the other semi, with the dividing fence going over the top. The width of the shelter was 9ft, which included 2 ft 6ins for the entrance, and length to the fence of 6ft 2ins, with equivalent measurements in the adjacent garden. There had been metal and wooden steps down into the shelter but these had corroded away. The entrance was half full of soil and rubbish. It would seem that the builder had merely covered the shelter with topsoil and omitted to tell the new owners.
Roman
Avenue, which is on the site of a Roman road, runs past the side of the Roman
fort. The
Avenue is on an east/west alignment joining Front Street in Chester-le-Street,
and running to the bypass.
Front Street is on the line of Cade’s Road, the Roman road from
Brough on Humber to Newcastle upon Tyne.
Two years ago I had been involved in an excavation in a garden two
streets away, nearer to the fort, where we found remains of the vicus,
the Roman town outside of the fort.
I always carry my dowsing rods with me and as I was curious to know
whether the vicus extended in the direction of Mr Harrison’s garden,
approximately 300 yards east of the fort, I dowsed the garden with permission
from Mr Harrison.
I picked up the imprint of a Roman road running parallel with the fence
on the east side of the garden opposite to the shelter, together with a
possible building.
I could see that Mr Harrison was sceptical about the dowsing, but I’m
used to people’s disbelief so it did not worry me.
However, he was interested in the possibility of Roman remains in his
garden and gave us full rein to dig anywhere we wanted to; a brave man indeed.
I
organised the gang for the following Sunday and two teams began to work, one
team clearing the shelter, the other starting a trench over the site of the
possible Roman remains.
It soon became clear that we were going to run short of space for the
spoil heaps, so it was decided to leave the shelter for another day and
continue with the trench.
However one of the chaps crawled into the shelter to take further
measurements, and I climbed down into the entrance and was able to take a few
photographs.
The soil extended right into the shelter and it would have taken
several skip loads to remove it.
Over the next three Sundays we excavated three large trenches, or holes depending on your outlook, measuring 4 ft square and 4ft deep. Two were running parallel to the fence and in the first trench, at a depth of two ft, we came across small squared stones as if part of a wall had tumbled down. In both trenches at 4ft down we found cobbles of the Roman road, together with pottery and a possible ball for a ballista or slingshot. The third trench was adjacent to the first but towards the centre of the garden, and there we found the cobbles of the road extending a further 18 ins, so we had found the edge. Next to the cobbles we uncovered about 18ins of ash, as if a wooden wall had burnt, then thick clay of a possible floor. We also discovered a throwing stone, which was taken to South Shields fort for comparison with their finds. I dowsed the building as a workshop but no remains were found to confirm its use.
On
our last Sunday, after hopefully leaving the garden as neat as we had found
it, Mr and Mrs Harrison asked if we would be interested in excavating the
front garden. I think they
enjoyed the experience as much as we had.
Although we take our work seriously we have fun doing it. We met as Ray’s students but are now friends and socialise
together. So my handy rods came
into use again and a building with cobbled floor was dowsed near to the front
fence and driveway. We
arranged to return on the following Sunday.
Ray
is now out of hospital and well on the way to recovery so I recently took him
to meet Mr and Mrs Harrison. I
also took a small display I made of the pottery found, which included Crambeck
and Black burnished ware, as a memento of our excavations.
I think we must have made a good impression as we have been invited
back to dig any time we wish. It would be interesting to see if there is anything left of
the building in the back garden and I will probably take Mr Harrison up on his
offer. Incidentally, the shelter
has been paved over and Mrs Harrison now has her patio but perhaps someone in
60 years’ time will rediscover the shelter again.
The
media heard of our exploits and we were featured, with coloured photographs,
in the local and national newspapers, garden magazines, and even Ceefax and
Teletext. Good publicity
for the Group.
October 2001
Roman
votive coins from Piercebridge identified
by
Raymond Selkirk, BA(Hons), BSc(Hons)
|
|
A thousand Roman coins have been found by
our divers along the line of the genuine Dere Street Roman Bridge at
Piercebridge, on the present and Roman riverbed, which were one and the same. Forget
about the expensive stainless-steel notices on the Roman site downstream which
claim that the remains of the high-and-dry Roman spillway of a dam was a
second Roman bridge and that the river has moved sideways and cut a
sixteen-feet deeper channel since Roman times. How could our sand-free Tees
cut a sixteen-feet deeper channel through solid rock in less that 2000 years
when the Colorado River, the most abrasive in the world and which is
liquid
sandpaper and carries ten tons of sand in suspension past any point every
second, has taken 2,000 years to cut down nine inches? Where therefore is the
Piercebridge Canyon? And while the
Colorado started its cutting action millions of years ago, why is it that our
“experts’ postulate that the Tees suddenly commenced its mythical
excavation through sixteen-feet of rock only during the Roman period? Arts-trained
archaeologists should set themselves up as neither civil engineers nor
geologists unless they take the appropriate degrees
or receive proper training. The time has come when they
can no longer bluff the general public merely by having a university
background.
John Casey of Durham University identified
most of the coins from the genuine Dere Street Bridge and pronounced that that
they were votive offerings cast onto the Roman riverbed during the whole 400
years of Roman occupation. However, local museums proclaim that the river in Roman
times was not here at all but sixteen-feet higher and 200 yards to the south
running through midair over the high-and-dry spillway of the Roman dam. According
to these museums, after flowing under the genuine Dere Street Roman Bridge,
the river leapt upwards and sideways to flow over the high and dry flood
spillway of the Roman dam further downstream. Only high winter floods crossed
this spillway, which was a Roman dam protection device. Similar
spillways can be seen on almost every dam in the world and these devices are
usually at an extreme end of the structure to be protected from flood damage.
|
|
The coins span the whole 400-year
occupation period as does the Roman pottery found along the line of the
genuine Dere Street bridge, so there was no need for a second bridge
downstream. The deviation of Dere Street shown on notice boards is purely
fictitious and was invented to attempt to show that the second structure was a
replacement Roman bridge for one, which had washed away.
There follows
References, compiled by Dr John Casey for our divers regarding some of the
Roman coins recovered from the present and Roman riverbed along the line of
the genuine Roman bridge, which has its southern abutment in the garden below
the George Hotel. After the recent floods, this abutment is now peeping out of
the bank side and would make an excellent excavation, which would dispel the
myths of recent years once and for all.
Mattingly & Sydenham (1923-81) [unless otherwise stated]
Cun
- Besley & Bland, The Cunetio Treasure (1983)
LRBC
- Carson, Hill &
Kent, Late Roman Bronze Coinage (1976)
MAZ
- Mazard, Corpus
Nummorum Numidiae Mauretaniaeque (1955)
SS
- Septimus Severus
Issuer's name inside quotation marks indicates counterfeits.
Issuer
Denomination
Reference Date
Juba II [Mauretania]
AE 20mm
MAZ.286
22-23
Nero
As
-
64-68
Galba
Denarius
167
68-69
Vespasian
Denarius
99
76
Sestertius
460
71
Titus
Denarius
229
80-81
Domitian
Denarius
149
90
Nerva
As
86
97
Sestersius
-
97
Trajan
Sestersius
as625
112-114
Dupondius
as414
99-117
As
393
98-99
Hadrian
Denarius
118(a)
119-122
Sestersius
751
134-138
Sestersius
-
117-138
Antoninus Pius
Denarius (frag)
162
147-148
Denarius
219 etc
152-153
Sestersius
751
144
Dupondius
-
138-161
As
as679
140-144
Faustina I
Denarius
394(a)
141-161
Sestersius
1102(a)
141-161
Faustina II
Denarius
515(a)
145-161
M Aurelius, caes.
Sestersius
468
155-159
As
1322
154-155
Ant.Pius, deified
Denarius
436
161-162
M Aurelius
Denarius
48
161-162
Sest.(pierced)
as1205
161-180
‘Faustina II’
Denarius(plated)
686
161+
Faustina II deified
Denarius
373
175-180
Sestersius
1693
175-180
Lucilla
Sestersius
1732
164-169
Commodus
Denarius
as57
181-192
Sestersius
441
183-184
Crispina
Sestersius
672
177
Sestersius
-
177
Clodius Albinus
Denarius
7
193-196
Septimus Severus
Denarius
10
193-194
Denarius
289
202-210
As
716
195-196
'Septimus Severus'
Denarius (cast)
40
194+
Denarius (plated)
-
193+
‘Julia Domna'
Denarius
552
196-211
‘Julia Domna'
Denarius (plated)
553
196+
Caracalla
Denarius
11
196-198
Denarius (plated)
158
206-210
‘Caracalla’
Denarius (plated)
asSS150
200+
Denarius
SS186
202+
Elagabalus
Denarius
49
221
Denarius (rolled, edges crimped)
218-222
'Elagabalus'
Denarius
(plated)
104
218+
Julia
Maesa
Denarius
268
218-222
Julia
Soemias
Denarius
241
218-222
Julia
Paula
Denarius
211
218-222
Severus
Alexander
Denarius
7(c)
222
Denarius
133
233-235
'Severus
Alexander'
Denarius (plated)
120
222+
Denarius
-
222+
Julia
Mamaea
Denarius
335
222-235
Denarius
335
222-235
Gordian
III
Antoninianus
38
238-244
'Gordian
III'
Antoninianus (plated)
Trebonoanus Gallus
55
253+
Volusian
Antoninianus
168
251-253
'
Trebonoanus Gallus'
Antoninianus (plated)
Gallienus
17
253+
Gallienus
Antoninianus
18
252-258
Valerian
II
Antoninianus
20
253-255
Valerian
II, deified
Antoninianus
9
255
Salonina
Antoninianus
31
256-257
'Claudius
II' deified
Antoninianus
266
270+
Postumus
Antoninianus
39
258-268
Victorinus
Antoninianus
asCun2537
268-270
'Victorinus'
Antoninianus
118
268+
Tetricus
I
Antoninianus
98/9
270-273
'Tetricus
I'
Antoninianus
141
273+
Victorinus/Tetricus
Antoninianus
-
268-273
'Victorinus/Tetricus'
Antoninianus
-
268+
Carausius
Aurelianus
880
286-290
Constantius
II
Siliqua
Arles207 353-355
Valentinian,
house
Sil (clipped)
as Trier (a)
378-383
Theodosius,
house
-
LRBC.2.807 etc
395-402
And hundreds more…………………
By
Peter Dewart
The Romans knew of silk at quite an early date. It is reported that the seven legions of M. Licinius Crassus were in pursuit of fleeing Parthians across the Euphrates in 53 B.C., when the Parthians deployed their shock tactic. Wheeling suddenly, they released a heavy hail of arrows - the Parthian shot - and charged the legions, unfurling huge silken banners, which blazed and flashed in the sunlight. Shocked and demoralised, the Romans fled leaving almost half of their number dead on the battlefield.
The Romans realised that the relatively primitive Parthians could not have made these huge shimmering banners themselves and set about trying to find the source of the material. This turned out to be a mysterious people living far out across central Asia. By trading they obtained samples of this new alluring material, "light as a cloud" and "translucent as ice", but demand soon exceeded supply. At one time silk was worth its own weight in gold.
The Parthians were not slow to cotton on (sorry!) that they could make fortunes as middlemen in the trade, so the silk route from China became consolidated as a regular trade route. It was not known as the 'Silk Route' until the nineteenth century, however.
Staring in China at Xi'an - famous now for its terracotta warriors - the route led between the southern edge of the Gobi desert and the massive Klin Lun Mountains and on to kashgar. It then headed westwards over "the roof of the world" - The High Pamir - and on to Samarkand, Isfahan and Palmyra - "the place of palms" - a distance of over four thousand miles.
As it developed, branching routes went to Bokhara; over the Karakoram passes to Srinagar; to Shiraz and the Persian Gulf and Baghdad among many others. At Palmyra, the western end, there are still extensive and spectacular ruins left by the Romans as a reminder of how important this place was to the empire.
When steady supplies reached Rome, all emperors and Patricians wanted to wear silk. Tiberius, however, thought it was decadent and banned men from wearing it. Gibbons comments that a silk garment was considered an ornament to a woman, but a disgrace to a man. Pliny, however, wrote disapprovingly of the new see-through material, which "renders women naked" and blamed women for the drain on the empire's economy imposed by their demand for silk!
Later, the horsemen of central Asia adopted silk as part of their body armour because it was light, cool in summer, warm in winter. The lightness also meant that their horses were faster and more nimble than those used by warriors wearing metal armour - and one other surprising advantage; often, when hit by an arrow the silk did not break, it gathered into the wound. By carefully teasing the material, the arrow could be extracted. The wound was still there, of course, but it was clean and could be dressed. Silk also has a mild disinfectant property. Whether the Romans discovered this use for silk is not known, but it would probably have been more expensive than chain mail.
Much of the material was derived from the book "Foreign Devils on the Silk Road" by Peter Hopkirk, published by John Murray in 1980, who gave permission for its use.
Ray
Selkirk, the truth behind his stay in hospital
NAG members and all Ray’s friends were
pleased to hear that he made a very good recovery following his stroke last
year. His tour of local
hospital facilities took him first to the new hospital at Dryburn, then to
the Freeman where he had a pacemaker fitted and finally to Chester-le-Street
General Hospital for further physiotherapy.
Ray livened up Aidan ward in Chester-le-Street
General where he returned to form telling dreadful jokes, all with a groan
factor of at least 11 on a scale of 0-10. Rumours that he was transferred to
Chester-le-Street because hospital staff at Dryburn couldn’t stand any
more of his old jokes (the old ones are the best) have been dismissed by
members of Ray’s Chester-le-Street evening class.
His stay at Dryburn shows that if ever there
was a case of over zealousness on the part of NAG members to excavate then
Ray provides, as ever, a good example. No sooner did he hear that the old
Dryburn hospital was being demolished and the new hospital open then he
cunningly got himself admitted on the pretext of needing hospital care.
Asked where he had hidden his trowel as he was in a prime site for
excavating, very near to a JCB, he looked a bit furtive so Nag members can
confidently expect to hear an announcement – “Dryburn,
the site of our lost Roman town. Well,
we’ve known about it for ages and now we’ve got the proof!
A number of us got ourselves admitted and during the night we scraped
around with our trowels and we came up with the evidence.
Mike Hodgson’s going to arrange for a crane to move the forum and
I’m on Radio Newcastle tomorrow. We’ve
got them on the run you know, they don’t know what a lewis hole is!”

So the Scourge of Valletta Convention will soon
be back with us. He’ll be out
there prodding the fields with Len Ludvigsen’s prototype geophys
instrument pretending he’s doing his exercises.
This object, proudly produced from the back of Len’s van a while
ago, closely resembles a Zimmer frame and Len says he’s fine tuning it.
In the meantime here’s Ray pictured last year
trying out the latest in archaeological equipment.
He’s with Jake Rollings, a member of Ray’s Chester-le-Street
evening class.
Pauline Magee
By
Tom Wright
On
the 24th January A.D.76 a son was born to a wealthy family in
Rome, which had come from Spain. He was named Publius Aelius Hadrianus and
like most wealthy sons in Rome he was educated by Greek Teachers and grew up
admiring all things Greek. Hadrian was only nine years old when his father
died and the emperor Trajan adopted the boy, Trajan being Hadrian’s
father’s cousin.

At the age of
twenty-three Hadrian married Trajan’s great niece, the thirteen-year-old
Sabina Augusta who grew to be a beautiful woman. However the marriage was
unhappy because Hadrian preferred the company of young men and Sabina
refused to have a child saying, “an offspring of his would harm the human
race”.
Hadrian was governor of
Syria at the age of forty-one when news arrived of Trajan's death. A letter
was produced (supposedly forged) claiming that Trajan elected Hadrian to
succeed him so he immediately returned to Rome. Here he found that the army
supported him but the Senate was against him. After four of the senate
members were executed the rest soon got the message and Hadrian became
emperor in 117 A.D.
Hadrian's policy was
peace and prosperity and during his reign he achieved this to a great
degree. He realised that the Empire had expanded too much and people on the
periphery were difficult to control. First he gave up everything east of the
Tigris an Euphrates and spent a lot of his time travelling
about the empire consolidating and defining frontiers, he cared about the
well being of his ordinary subjects, both Roman and Provincial and many
building projects and roads are attributed to him.
In Germany in A.D. 121
Hadrian constructed his first artificial frontier consisting of timber
palisades and ditches. The following year he came to Britain, possibly
directly to the Tyne. There is a hint, but no proof, of trouble in northern
Britain between A.D. 110 and A.D. 120; the 6th legion sailed into the Tyne
about this time to replace the 9th legion, which disappears from history about the same time. The 6th
legion was stationed at York from this time to the end of Roman Britain, but
why sail into the Tyne? Surely the Humber would have been much nearer to
York, unless they were needed in the northern area first to put down some
uprising. Whatever happened we would never know, but Hadrian made the
decision to erect a defensive wall right across the narrowest part of
Britain Tyne to Solway, a wall that history books will always name as
"Hadrian’s Wall”. The
wall had a well-guarded gate in it at one roman mile intervals so it was
obviously intended as a well-controlled frontier rather than a total
barrier. The wall forts were added later, we could only guess the
reason, indeed we do not truly know
the reason why Hadrian built this wall.
Hadrian's biographer
tells us that the emperor never travelled
in style and preferred riding on horseback and even on foot with his
soldiers, also sharing their rations of bread, cured meat and cheap wine. He
presided over an empire with a strong economy due to his excellent
administration and fund-raising ability without raising taxes.
Near Rome Hadrian had a
magnificent villa, which can be visited to this day in which he used to
retire with his favourite
male companion, a young Greek named Antinous. During a tour of Egypt
Antinous accompanied Hadrian and Sabina and was mysteriously drowned in the
Nile, leaving Hadrian devastated. By A.D. 136 Hadrian was in poor health and
a year later his wife Sabina died. The emperor retired from public life but
by then was in constant pain, begging his doctors to end his life, which
they refused.
On the 10th
of July A.D. 138, aged 62 and with 2l years of rule, Hadrian managed to
overdose himself and died. His adopted son Antoninus Pius succeeded him as
emperor.
The work by Karen Wake and Steve Orme, a documentary, has finally been shown to the public in a premier at the Tom Cowie lecture theatre, St Peters Campus of Sunderland University. Karen and Steve have been working on this for months as part of their MA course. They had involved several volunteers from NAG in the production and the end product was of outstanding quality. The Sunderland Echo ran an article on Saturday 16th March 2002, to let people know of the event, which was attended by about 120. The programme demonstrated the work of the group using the great Roman Dam at Hylton as the historical subject. Karen and Steve will be attempting to market the concept to TV companies; we wish them every success!
Work in Kent may have found the major missing Roman town of Rutupiae in Richborough. A geophysical survey has revealed a lot more information about the site and Tony Wilmott, who is carrying out work on the site on behalf of English heritage, believes he has identified the lost harbour.
Sources: Guardian. 13/10/2001
Daily telegraph. 26/12/2001
Work on a site at Gresham Street in London has uncovered two remarkable R